As if winning the WSOP bracelet wasn’t good enough or for Jamie Gold’s $12 million dollar score back in 2006, this structures for you! Poker is about a lot of things, but mainly it comes down to money, who is getting it, how many, and how much.
With these questions weighing on WSOP director Jack Effel’s mind, hours upon hundreds of hours have been spent revising the payout schedule and he simply put it, “I think this is a poker player’s dream payout!” Although the details may seem insignificant, the payout structure could determine whether or not players come back to the game.
In the beginning, payout structures were extremely top heavy. Paying out 50% of the prize pool to first place, 20% to second place and 10% to third place, left too much room of gambling for the percentages. If the these structures were to be in place in today’s games, last year’s winner Peter Eastgate would have taken home over $32 million dollars.
Unarguably, the prize pool would not be nearly as high, had the structure been this way. Players these days want to enter for the $10K and make some kind of profit. Matt Savage, a well respected tournament director, gives online poker most of the credit for these changes. “Online payouts are flat, very flat - 15% to 12% for first place.” said Savage.
Ultimately, making a flatter payout schedule has become priority one for Effel. Though this was not an easy task, Effel needed help and he turned to Dr. Adam Schwartz, a professor of BA, at both WA and Lee Universities in Virginia. Mathematical theories from Issac Newton were discussed and they decided on a constrained optimization program. “It’s a kind of math problem where a limited number of resources meet a bunch of constraints. In this particular case, the constraints would be how much the payouts change from one place to the other.” said Schwartz.
Effel called Schwartz on the day of the 2005 main event and they plugged in the numbers, 30 minutes later they had their structure. Unsatisfied with the outcome, they continued to make changes. By the time the 2006 main event came around, they realized just how top heavy these payout were, because Jamie Gold collected a $12 million payday.
After this payday, poker pro Barry Greenstein approached Effel and said “Your payouts are super top-heavy, this is what they should have been.” Greenstein, a mathematician, had the luxury of working these payout after the number of players were announced, yet still, he was on to something. Having something to go on for the payout schedule for 2007, Effel had assistance from the poker professor, Howard Lederer, in creating a better system.
After over 200 hours of work, Lederer and Effel came up with the 2007 prize table and afterwards, Greenstein approached them again suggesting, “We should use Golden Ratios for every place at the final table.” Determined to get it right, combined forces, Greenstein, Effel, and Schwartz using a little bit of art and a lot of math, to come up with 2009’s payout schedule.
After four years including hundreds and hundreds of hours, Effel believes he finally has got it right. To give you an example of how it will work, had the same schedule been used last year, that is going to be used this year, the top 12 finishers would have become millionaires, rather than only the top 8. They accomplished this by shaving merely thousands off each prize.
Isn’t this what it’s all about, a little bit of something for everyone? Job well done to Effel, now let’s see if the poker world agrees. The 2009 WSOP Main Event is scheduled to begin on May 26th.